Archive for July, 2010

The Insanity of “Honour Killings” – a Required Response

Anyone who knows me will attest to my support for liberal immigration policies and the many benefits of multiculturalism.  It sets Canada and British Columbia apart.  And there was no better evidence than our recent Olympic and Paralympic Games, where it seemed that every second Canadian appeared to have come from somewhere else.  Canada’s welcoming embrace of other cultures is something in which we should all take a great deal of pride.

I am, however, just one of millions of Canadians who are horrified by honour killings, primarily within our Muslim community.  I am sure that the vast majority of Muslims share our revulsion for these crimes.  A most recent example before the courts was the murder of 16 year old Aqsa Parvaz, who expressed a desire to wear western clothes, doff the hijab and integrate more fully with her Mississauga peer group.  Her father and brother were sentenced to life in prison for murdering her, ostensibly for the purpose of maintaining family honour.

According to a UN State of the World Population report, there are approximately 5000 women and girls killed around the world every year as a result of this phenomenon, with 13 in Canada since 2002.

I can appreciate that there must be many challenges associated with arriving in Canada from other countries, but this centuries old tradition needs to be exposed for what it is… tribal insanity under the guise of something that, at some point long ago, was somehow considered virtuous.

I don’t claim to have all of the answers, but we might want to start with educating those who seek entry into Canada.  We need to ensure that aspiring immigrants clearly understand where the boundaries are set in a society where women and girls can feel safe from these acts of barbarism.

RCMP Boss Gary Bass under Fire for Dziekanski Email

Enough already.  Here is the bottom line.  The four police officers responsible for Robert Dziekanski’s death conducted themselves like cowards before, during and after this tragic event.

After this fiasco, Deputy Commissioner Gary Bass, one of the finest operational police officers still in the RCMP, is probably looking forward to a well-deserved retirement from the Force.  A copy of his internal email made the front page of the Vancouver Sun on June 17th, where his characterization of the RCMP apology to the Dziekanski family was described as ‘troubling’, by a senior PMO official.  Bass was clearly operating in good faith, explaining the spirit of his apology to Mr. Dziekanski’s mother,   Zofia  Cisowski, to the RCMP membership.  Mrs. Cisowski herself confirmed that the wording of the apology had been agreed upon at a meeting between her and Bass, so as not to undermine or prejudge the outcome of the Braidwood inquiry.  She expressed satisfaction with its content.  And that in itself should be the measurement.

Those meek and timid souls who would dissect every phrase of those who are actually in the arena need to get a life.  Gary Bass did as he often does.  He got it right.

RCMP Surveillance Described as Negligent

Disappointing but hardly surprising commentary in a June 13th article in The Province from Don Morrison, defense counsel for Charles Kembo. Kembo was convicted on June 11th for four homicides including that of his own stepdaughter, Rita Yeung.

For Morrison, a former Police Complaints Commissioner, to publicly announce:  “a young woman gets set up and left alone by police to be killed” is extreme and over the top.

There could be scores of killers walking the streets of Greater Vancouver at any given time – and Charles Kembo was but one of these.  Police managers throughout the province of BC operate with strained resources in good faith, applying manpower based upon carefully considered enforcement priorities which can change at any time.  These leaders accept the consequences of error inherent in their job, and base their decisions on information available to them at the time.  Keeping the public safe is not easy work.

Police officers agonize over the death of an innocent.  In the cold light of day, the notion of terminating a mobile surveillance of Kembo on the night he killed Ms. Yeung is disturbing.  There were, in all likelihood, valid reasons for the decision.  There may have been nothing to suggest that Ms. Yeung was any more at risk than many other British Columbians in the company of men like Charles Kembo on that particular night.  It may have been that the police manager felt that the GPS and audio device in Kembo’s vehicle provided sufficient awareness of Ms. Yeung’s risk level to allow for a 911 response if there were signs of trouble.  Pedestrian as it may seem, it may also have been explained by a lack of available overtime funding to extend the shift of surveillance personnel.

Decisions upon where to apply precious surveillance resources are generally fraught with risk and subject to scrutiny after the fact if something goes wrong.  It goes with the territory of being a police manager in British Columbia today.

I support a review of the police decision to terminate the surveillance of Kembo that night.  The explanation is bound to shed light on the violent death of this young woman.  I expect that it will be explained, as many of these tragedies are, by the fact that there are simply too few police officers to address the public need.  Let’s wait for the findings before we indulge in recreational platitudes in the absence of the facts, as Mr. Morrison has so publicly done.

This was yet another example of the fine work done by senior Crown Counsel Hank Reiner, one of the absolute best at what he does.  We have been very fortunate to have him securing convictions against the worst of men for so many years.

Perjury and its Prevalence within our Criminal Justice System

One of the realities within our criminal justice system is the tacit acceptance of lies under oath, most commonly encountered when accused persons testify on their own behalf.  To suggest that this behaviour is tolerated by the judiciary is to understate the current state of affairs in the courts of British Columbia.  With the exception of the high profile conviction of Air India co-conspirator Inderjit Singh Reyat, we never seem to hear about perjury charges being laid. In almost every criminal trial where testimony is provided by multiple witnesses, the judge (or judge and jury) is required to weigh the credibility of those whose evidence is being heard.  It is hardly uncommon that the judge’s reasons contain references to the lack of credibility of one or more witnesses.

In the proceedings following the tragic death of Robert Dziekanski, there were a number of police officers who obviously lied under oath, driven by a desire for career preservation.  This is behaviour perhaps learned from members of the RCMP’s commissioned ranks who clearly perjured themselves during the APEC Inquiry, in addition to similar performances coming from the Office of the Commissioner himself.

More recently in BC, we have read coverage of the interminable multiple murder trial of Charles Kembo, where the accused committed perjury almost every time his lips moved.

The judicial system would appear to be encouraging this behaviour through the absence of sanctions against those who view an oath as a nuisance, rather than a solemn instrument of justice.  It is my view that civilian oversight of police agencies in serious cases of misconduct is overdue.  A logical extension of this is the commitment to investigate testimony provided by police officers where lies under oath are suspected.  Similarly, in cases where a civilian witness or an accused are believed to have perjured themselves, resources must be committed toward the investigation of this behaviour using all evidence gathering tools available.

There is no denying that such a shift in approach will be expensive.
With these measures undertaken, however, public confidence in our policing, legal and judicial institutions will have a chance of being restored.  The citizens of Canada deserve nothing less.